Skip to main content

Foundations of a Leadership Academy

Originally Written: 06/04/2016

I want to say that like most people, I spent some time thinking about what kind of training or curriculum a person could engage in that would best result in a group of highly competent leaders resistant to the ills that accompany these roles such as corruption and maleficence. Duriang this day I took to writing, I came to the conclusion that in order to get competent leaders, you have to teach them the rulebook while they’re young, and tailor their curriculum based on their age and to expand the range of subjects to include things that are not currently taught in the current American school system. Without further ado, I lay out my idea below.

A system of sort needs to have a defined set of core values. They are:

  • ·      Moral fortitude
  • ·      A well-rounded knowledge base in the natural science, social sciences, business, and interpersonal communications
  • ·      Critical thinking
  • ·      Problem solving

Since we’ll be choosing children to enter this sort of academy, we have to assume that some kids will be well tempered to become leaders and others will not. To reduce the probability of recruiting subpar candidates or recruiting the children of nefarious parents looking to plant their children into the high positions, the selection process needs to be able to exclude them. Therefore, the selection process follows as:

·      Age

o   The candidates should be around 6-8 years old to bring the children into a full and complete devotion to leadership and service.

·      Selection Process

o   Model A is based on an application or a recommendation from their current schools or family. In this model, the child must already demonstrate outstanding moral character.

o   Model B uses trained recruiters to identify children of high moral character regardless of social background.

o   Parents and child are interviewed together to discuss curriculum, intensity of the program, and how often they will see their children during the program.

o   The family is then put under a 3-week observational period to assure that the family and child are in good moral standing, and to reduce the likelihood of nefarious intent behind enrollment.

o   Al social experiment will be conducted on the family to give a final confirmation of the family’s value system.

We’re working with younger children in this case, how could we tailor a curriculum to improve the outcome that they will become competent and resilient leaders? In this respect, the curriculum will be tweaked to account for two principles of development. First, pre-puberty is a good time to introduce the basics of a curriculum. Second, during puberty, no matter how well behaved they are, teenagers are primarily concerned with the social life, so the curriculum during those years should focus on social life. Once the “angst” is mostly subsided, this is the perfect opportunity to teach about the complexities of human life. Moving on, the basic framework of the curriculum follows the following timeline:

·      6yo – 12yo: The basics

o   History

o   Basic biology

o   Writing/reading

o   Methods of cognition

o   Introduction to group work and dynamics

o   Introduction to ethics

·      13yo – 16yo: The social life

o   Ethics

o   Philosophy

o   Sociology

o   Anthropology

o   Psychology

o   Biology and sexual education

·      17yo – 21yo: The materialistic complexity of the world

o   Mathematics

o   Statistics

o   Chemistry

o   Physics

o   Current and future developments of technology

·      22yo – 25yo: Social complexity of the world

o   Economics and game theory

o   Political theory

o   Literary analysis

o   Logic and rhetoric

o   Business fundamentals and management

o   Year-long practicum in leadership and management

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Revival

Introduction It's been about two years since my last post. As expected in life, many things have changed over the course of two years. These changes first brought me to abandon the blog in the first place, but just like in all cycles, the blog will come back because the changes in life find its way back here. What's changed? The biggest changes in life since the last blog is that I became highly involved in nonprofit work, and have developed quickly as a leader in my local nonprofit community. I started my own nonprofit and sat on the board of a second at the same time throughout the past 2 years. This all happened while I'm still working my day job as a researcher. While that presents a full schedule, there was still enough time to engage in online antics during the moments when I was walking from A->B, on an elevator, or the occasional downtime periods. In those gaps, I was in charge of a couple of online Discord communities.  How did this affect blogging? Firstly, it ...

On Living a Double Life

  I think it's hit me over the past few days that I live a double life, professionally speaking. At Work I work at a government research facility as a biomedical researcher that's embedded into a clinic. Our system is like this because doctors who work in clinical resaerch are still doctors, and doctor's don't have time to understand all the nuances of conducting research. They're concerned with getting their question answered about whether something is going to be a better treatment or not than what's already out there. Because of the government aspect, as well as the structure of clinical clinical research. We have a very clear hierarchy in my workplace that can be described from top to bottom: Medical Doctors Lab Chiefs Nursing Chiefs Physician Assistants Nurse Practioners Nurses who coordinate studies Nurses who manage individual patient cases Non-chief scientists regardless of credentials (PhD, MS, BS/BA) In this sense, I'm at the bottom of this hierarc...

The Metaverse Primer by Jefferies Part 2: A Peculiar Economy

 Introduction Continuing in our discussion over the fine piece of analysis that is the Metaverse Primer by Wall Street financial firm Jefferies, I wanted to take some time to highlight and discuss some of the more strange and peculiar aspects of what the metaverse economy will look like. In addition to our source material from last week’s Part 1 (link below), we’ll also add a video released by Meta Platforms (formerly Facebook) about Mark Zuckerberg’s (The Zucc) vision of what the metaverse will look like to him, and likely a siginificant portion of the future metaverse for whatever that will look like. Beginning with the Jefferies article before we move on to the video from the Zucc, we’ll slide into the first peculiarity below. Link to original article:  https://assets.website-files.com/61152de79f1b0a81f1dcf4b7/615e101cf1cda13c40ee4d13_Metaverse%20Primer.pdf Peculiarity 1: Digital Consultants for Everything? One of the strange things that authors of the Metaverse mention on ...