Skip to main content

Quick Take: USCD Hospital Worker COVID19 Correspondence From NEJM

Over the past 24 hours, the New England Journal of Medicine published a correspondence letter from researchers at the University of California, San Diego title “Resurgence of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in a Highly Vaccinated Health System Workforce” [1]. In this letter the authors report that by March 2021, 76% of their healthcare staff was fully vaccinated, and by July, they reached an 83% vaccination rate for their workforce. They collected data using only workers that demonstrated at least one symptom during daily screening, and that had a positive COVID19 PCR test across both vaccinated and unvaccinated people.

This method cultivated in the figure below that I would describe as cathartic for those who are in the unvaccinated crowd out there.


 


We can see that the rate of the symptomatic vaccinated workers has increased by a much sharper degree than the unvaccinated. In fact, according to the table from the article below, the vaccinated group only made up 19% - 33% of symptomatic cases until July. In July, they made up 75% of all the symptomatic cases reported.



Along the way, the authors have been calculating the vaccine effectiveness rate based on the differences between the unvaccinated group and the vaccinated group as shown in the bottom part of the table (the approximation of the math is 100 – [(Vaccinated attack rate)/unvaccinated attack rate) * 100). By July, the effectiveness of the vaccines drop to a dismal 65%.

The author’s conclusion:

“The dramatic change in vaccine effectiveness from June to July is likely to be due to both the emergence of the delta variant and waning immunity over time, compounded by the end of masking requirements in California and the resulting greater risk of exposure in the community.”

However, I’ll add that there are other reasons to explain this sudden shift in the vaccinated becoming more and more likely to get sick than the unvaccinated.

Archo’s Additions: 

1.    False security theory. The vaccinated workers are less likely to be careful about the use of preventative measures. Invincibility complexes are easy to achieve since the much of the messaging about the vaccines until now have been "you can go back to normal." [2,3]

2.     Business practice theory. It's possible that University of California, San Diego knows who is and is not vaccinated. They may be "sidelining" unvaccinated workers because of their status and as a byproduct increases the exposure for the vaccinated workers, leading them to be infected more.

3.    Immunity disparity theory. If we assume that both groups have similar exposure to COVID19 patients, but the vaccinated group have mostly monoclonal (single type) antibodies against spike protein. Meanwhile the unvaccinated could have mostly polyclonal (many type) antibodies against the spike protein they were exposed to while working since they weren't trained by the vaccine for their immune response [4].

4.    False pretense theory. The data on the effectiveness of the vaccines against Delta variant was even worse than we thought. Keep in mind Moderna claimed their vaccine was highly effective against delta based on a study of only 8 people [5,6]. Meanwhile, Pfizer-BioNTech claimed that their vaccine was 88% effective against the delta strain based on a study they submitted to the New England Journal of Medicine [7].

References:

[1] Keehner J, Horton LE, Binkin NJ, et al. Resurgence of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in a Highly Vaccinated Health System Workforce. New England Journal of Medicine. 2021;0:null.

[2]  “Go get the shot”: Biden highlights path back to normal [Internet]. AP NEWS. 2021 [cited 2021 Sep 3]. Available from: https://apnews.com/article/pandemics-health-joe-biden-business-government-and-politics-3d38206bc38f012b9598154b59d27d1f.

[3]  CDC Says Vaccinated People Can Go Back to Normal Life | Voice of America - English [Internet]. [cited 2021 Sep 3]. Available from: https://www.voanews.com/covid-19-pandemic/cdc-says-vaccinated-people-can-go-back-normal-life.

[4]  Lipman NS, Jackson LR, Trudel LJ, et al. Monoclonal Versus Polyclonal Antibodies: Distinguishing Characteristics, Applications, and Information Resources. ILAR Journal. 2005;46:258–268.

[5]  Reuters. Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine shows promise against Delta variant in lab study. Reuters [Internet]. 2021 Jun 29 [cited 2021 Sep 3]; Available from: https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/modernas-covid-19-vaccine-shows-promise-against-delta-variant-lab-study-2021-06-29/.

[6]  Choi A, Koch M, Wu K, et al. Serum Neutralizing Activity of mRNA-1273 against SARS-CoV-2 Variants [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2021 Sep 3]. p. 2021.06.28.449914. Available from: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.06.28.449914v1.

[7]  Lopez Bernal J, Andrews N, Gower C, et al. Effectiveness of Covid-19 Vaccines against the B.1.617.2 (Delta) Variant. New England Journal of Medicine. 2021;385:585–594.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Revival

Introduction It's been about two years since my last post. As expected in life, many things have changed over the course of two years. These changes first brought me to abandon the blog in the first place, but just like in all cycles, the blog will come back because the changes in life find its way back here. What's changed? The biggest changes in life since the last blog is that I became highly involved in nonprofit work, and have developed quickly as a leader in my local nonprofit community. I started my own nonprofit and sat on the board of a second at the same time throughout the past 2 years. This all happened while I'm still working my day job as a researcher. While that presents a full schedule, there was still enough time to engage in online antics during the moments when I was walking from A->B, on an elevator, or the occasional downtime periods. In those gaps, I was in charge of a couple of online Discord communities.  How did this affect blogging? Firstly, it ...

On Living a Double Life

  I think it's hit me over the past few days that I live a double life, professionally speaking. At Work I work at a government research facility as a biomedical researcher that's embedded into a clinic. Our system is like this because doctors who work in clinical resaerch are still doctors, and doctor's don't have time to understand all the nuances of conducting research. They're concerned with getting their question answered about whether something is going to be a better treatment or not than what's already out there. Because of the government aspect, as well as the structure of clinical clinical research. We have a very clear hierarchy in my workplace that can be described from top to bottom: Medical Doctors Lab Chiefs Nursing Chiefs Physician Assistants Nurse Practioners Nurses who coordinate studies Nurses who manage individual patient cases Non-chief scientists regardless of credentials (PhD, MS, BS/BA) In this sense, I'm at the bottom of this hierarc...

The Metaverse Primer by Jefferies Part 2: A Peculiar Economy

 Introduction Continuing in our discussion over the fine piece of analysis that is the Metaverse Primer by Wall Street financial firm Jefferies, I wanted to take some time to highlight and discuss some of the more strange and peculiar aspects of what the metaverse economy will look like. In addition to our source material from last week’s Part 1 (link below), we’ll also add a video released by Meta Platforms (formerly Facebook) about Mark Zuckerberg’s (The Zucc) vision of what the metaverse will look like to him, and likely a siginificant portion of the future metaverse for whatever that will look like. Beginning with the Jefferies article before we move on to the video from the Zucc, we’ll slide into the first peculiarity below. Link to original article:  https://assets.website-files.com/61152de79f1b0a81f1dcf4b7/615e101cf1cda13c40ee4d13_Metaverse%20Primer.pdf Peculiarity 1: Digital Consultants for Everything? One of the strange things that authors of the Metaverse mention on ...